Clinical practice guideline and pathways for the evaluation and management of patients with dizziness in family and community practice

Background@#Dizziness is a commonly encountered symptom in the primary care which can be caused, most of the time by benign condition and rarely due to serious conditions needing higher level of care.@*Objective@#To develop a clinical guideline and pathway that will serve as guide in the diagnosis and management of adult patients with dizziness in primary care and outpatient setting@*Methods@#A guideline development team was formed which is composed of family and community medicine specialists from different institutions. Searching, selection and assessment of the latest evidence on dizziness diagnosis and management was done using the search terms: “dizziness”, “diagnosis”, “management”, and “primary care”. Formulation of the recommendation was done using Grade approach and graded with modified GRADEPro and expert panel consensus. External review was also done by an expert in otorhinolaryngology.@*Recommendations@#Clinical Assessment •Recommendation1.Askforthepatient’sdescriptionofdizzinessandclassifythepatientintooneofthefourtypes: vertigo, presyncope, disequilibrium, and lightheadedness and classify as acute/episodic or chronic/sustained. (Strong Recommendation, Low Quality Evidence) •Recommendation2.Obtainamedicalhistoryfocusingonthetiming,triggers,associatedsymptoms,riskfactorsfor atherosclerotic vascular disease, and functional status or quality of life. (Strong Recommendation, High Quality Evidence) •Recommendation3.Performaphysicalexaminationfocusingonvitalsigns,HEENT(includingotoscopy),cardiovascular and neurologic examination. (Strong Recommendation, High Quality Evidence) •Recommendation4.PerformspecialphysicalexaminationslikeDix-Hallpikemaneuverforacuteepisodictriggeredvertigo to check for BPPV (most common cause of peripheral vertigo), HINTS plus test for spontaneous episodic vertigo to check for stroke and hyperventilation provocation test for patients suspected of anxiety (Strong Recommendation, High Quality Evidence) •Recommendation5.Elicitredflagsthatshouldwarrantreferrallikeseveredizzinessandassociated,alteredmentalstatus, loss of consciousness and abnormal vital signs. Other symptoms like chest pain, palpitations, dyspnea, neurologic deficit may warrant referral for evaluation and management. (Strong Recommendation, High Quality Evidence) •Recommendation6.Forpatientsconsultingviatelemedicine,obtainamedicalhistoryfocusingonthetiming,triggers, associated symptoms, risk factors for atherosclerotic vascular disease, and functional status or quality of life, and observe and conduct self-physical examination (vital signs, mental status, ocular and facial nerve) (Strong Recommendation, Low Quality Evidence) Diagnostic •Recommendation7.Laboratorytestingisnotroutinelyrecommendedamongpatientswithdizziness.However,testingmay be requested if there is a need to identify a definite etiology to guide treatment and should be guided by the classification of dizziness, possible etiology, and the medical history and physical examination. (Strong Recommendation, High Quality Evidence).Recommendation8.Forpatientswithvertigoandwithauditorysymptoms(i.e.,hearingloss,tinnitusandauralfullness, etc.), pure tone audiometry speech test may be requested if available. (Strong Recommendation, High Quality Evidence) •Recommendation9.Forpatientswithpresyncope/syncopeandachronicmedicalconditionisbeingconsidered,complete blood count may be requested for those with probable blood dyscrasia, serum blood glucose may be requested for those with diabetes, electrocardiogram and lipid profile may be requested for those with cardiovascular disease. (Strong Recommendation, High Quality Evidence) •Recommendation10.Forpatientswithdisequilibriumandwithanabnormalneurologicphysicalexaminationfinding,CT scan may be requested. (Strong Recommendation, High Quality Evidence) Pharmacologic •Recommendation11.Empirictrialofshortcourse(7days)pharmacologictreatmentforsymptomreliefshouldbeoffered. Referral should be considered if the dizziness become more severe or it did not improve in 7 days. (Strong Recommendation, High Quality Evidence) •Recommendation12.Forpatientswithmildtomoderatevertigo,offerhistamineanalogue(betahistine)orantihistamine (meclizine, diphenhydramine, dimenhydrinate or cinnarizine) for symptom relief. (Strong Recommendation, High Quality Evidence) •Recommendation13.Forpatientswithmildtomoderatevertigoassociatedwithmigraine(vestibularmigraine),aside from symptom relief, offer any of the triptans as preventive medication. (Strong Recommendation, High Quality Evidence) •Recommendation14.Forpatientswhosedizzinessisdescribedasdisequilibrium(gaitimbalance)orpresyncope(near faintness) or dizziness with anxiety attack, offer symptomatic treatment and intervention based on the underlying cause or consider referral to appropriate specialist. (Strong Recommendation, High Quality Evidence) Non-pharmacologic •Recommendation15.Allpatientsshouldbeprovidedwithhealtheducationoncauses,triggersandfollowup.(Strong Recommendation, Low Quality Evidence) •Recommendation16.Allpatientsshouldbeadvisedonappropriatedietandlifestylemodification.(StrongRecommendation, Low Quality Evidence) •Recommendation17.Dependingonthenatureofvertigo,educateandtrainthepatientoncanalrepositioningmaneuver and vestibular rehabilitation. Referral to rehabilitation medicine may be considered. (Strong Recommendation, High Quality Evidence) •Recommendation18.Thepatient’sfamilymustalsobeprovidedwithhealtheducationandidentifyacaregivertoassist and promote compliance to management. (Strong Recommendation, Low Quality Evidence) •Recommendation19.Encouragecommunity-basedvestibularrehabilitationactivitiessuchasgroupbalancetraining exercise. (Strong Recommendation, Low Quality Evidence) Patient Outcomes •Recommendation20.Thepatientshouldknowthenatureofdizziness,causesandpotentialcomplicationsanddevelop skills in postural exercises. (Strong Recommendation, Moderate Quality Evidence) •Recommendation21.Decreaseinfrequencyandseverityshouldexpectedwithin48hoursandresolutionisexpectedwithin a month. (Strong Recommendation, Moderate Quality Evidence) •Recommendation22.Improvedqualityoflifeshouldalsobeelicited.(StrongRecommendation,ModerateQualityEvidence) •Recommendation23.Referraltoappropriatespecialtyshouldbedoneifnoresolutionorprogressionofsymptomsor impaired quality of life for more than a month. (Strong Recommendation, Expert Opinion)@*Implementation@#The committee shall disseminate the guidelines through presentations and via journal publications. The QA committee shall be in charge of implementation of the guideline and pathway.

Intensification in the management of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) using insulin in family practice

Background@#Diabetes mellitus type 2 (T2DM) is a chronic metabolic disease leading to target organ complications over time. The delays in treatment and glycemic control have significant implications in short and long-term health outcomes resulting in increased healthcare resource utilization thus timely insulin initiation and intensification is recommended@*Objective@#This clinical pathway was developed to guide family and community physicians on how to intensify the treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) using insulin intended for patients who require insulin initiation or titration@*Methods@#The PAFP Clinical Pathways Group reviewed published literature in order to identify, summarize and operationalize the evidence in the management of T2DM patients on insulin use in family and community practice. The recommendations are time bound tasks on patient care processes, in terms of history and physical examination, laboratory tests, pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic interventions and patient outcomes@*Summary of Recommendations@#The recommendations on clinical history and physical examination, laboratory, pharmacologic interventions, non-pharmacologic interventions subdivided into patient-centered, family-focused and community-oriented and patient outcomes are grouped into first visit and second visit, continuing visits

Factors affecting bypass of local health care facilities in a tertiary hospital: A key to utilization of primary health care services

Background@#Bypass, is a pattern of seeking health care outside the local community where primary health care facilities are not efficiently utilized. It is common practice for patients to go directly to secondary or tertiary health facilities for primary health concerns, causing heavy traffic at the higher level facilities and corresponding over-utilization of resources.@*Objective@#This study aimed to determine factors associated in the bypass of health care facilities among outpatient department patients and to identify health care facility factors perceived important among patients.@*Method@#The study employed self-administered questionnaire with the assistance of trained research assistants among patients who sought consult at the Baguio General Hospital and Medical Center Outpatient Department during the study period of August 2018 – October 2018. Respondents were asked about demographic characteristics, health insurance status, referral status, health care facility factors and answer the Personal Satisfaction Questionnaire 18 (PSQ 18) survey.@*Results@#The questionnaire survey included 251 patients. The total rate bypassing of local health care facilities was 37.8%. Pearson chi square test revealed that educational attainment was associated with increased bypass of health care facilities (p=0.013). Factors such as age, sex, civil status, employment status, monthly income and health insurance status were significantly associated with bypass. Availability of medical doctors was the most prevelant factor in choosing a health care facility in both bypassers (36%) and non bypassers (46%). PSQ 18 survey revealed that patients are generally satisfied on the availment of health services in both bypassers (mean 3.78) and non bypassers (mean 3.89). The subscales in communication, time spent with doctor and accessibility and convenience were scored highest while technical quality was scored lowest on both groups.@*Conclusion@#Bypass of local health care facilities is a major health concern. Travelling longer distances for health care imposes unnecessary shift of direct health care costs into indirect costs such as transport. Increasing awareness of available local health care facilities and services together with its improvement might help decrease bypass especially on patients with lower educational attainment. The referral system and network of health care providers should be reinforced for better health care service delivery, patient satisfaction and lower health care cost.